It would be great to be able to build a color map of a measured part based on its comparison with another patter-part and no with its CAD.

This option would be very usefull, for example, in the case where we have 2 parts: at first sight both of the parts have the same dimensions because the results of the measurements of both parts with caliper are similar and both parts are on tolerance with the CAD/drawing, but only one of them could be assembled. So, it would have sense that the difference between them must be on the shape, and the mentioned option would be the best chance to be able to see it.

I inspect a lot of small components with cavity number identifiers.  It would help with automation to have an algorithm that works like an OCR and can be used to autofill key-in fields. 

Additionally, I've had jobs that define the true position of a Letter.

ASME Y14.5-2009 7.6.2.3 Coaxial Features Without Datum References

This is an ability that I would like to see in PC-DMIS Xact-Measure.

If the call out is per the spec then PC-DMIS should abide by the standard.

AYNI DELİKTEN FAZLA OLDUĞU ZAMAN TABANA DOKUNUP AYNI TABANDA OLAN DELIKLERI 'SHIFT' E BASARAK SİLİNDİRMİ YADA DELİKMİ OLDUĞUNU SEÇERKEN HATVE (PİTCH) DEĞERİ GİREMİYORUM  BUNUN EKLENMESİ GEREK..

As it stands now. .xlsm (macro) is not an option and .XLSX is the new version but, does not work correctly.

.xlsm is 1997 version. I have worked with these sheet forever and the new PCDMIS wizard does not even

work anymore.

Automatic angle feature does not work in holes with an angle?

Automatic angle feature does not work in holes with an angle

Optiv machine equipped with cws 1mm can generate COPs that shall be used to calculate roughness dimensions.

Actually the processing of the COPs is made with an additional external Software.

An implementation of the roughness in pcdmis would make this measurement less complicate and reduce Costs for external Software (Mahr).

Would like to take "sample hits" in diameters and then scan with the updated size/location.  Sometimes a diameter is allowed to vary drastically but still needs scanned.  Maybe something a little more elegant than measuring a 3 point circle and updating from it.

Why can't I use the "A-B" cover for concentricity and coaxiality?

References are circles and cylinders.